"Patients given the Dermapen all felt the procedure was a smaller amount painful than derma moving and also the down time was considerably shorter using the Dermapen. Subjectively, patients given the Dermapen felt their acne skin damage had enhanced to some greater extent than patients using the derma moving. Visioscan data demonstrated considerably greater decrease in depth of scars while using Dermapen in comparison to derma moving." Professor Tony Chu, FRCP, Skin care Department, Imperial College, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United kingdom
Dermapen releases open clinical study of management of Atrophic Acne Scarring Evaluating Derma Moving versus Dermapen along with a three dimensional animation video showing the comparison between Derma Moving and Dermapen Micro-Needling device.
Management Of ATROPHIC ACNE Skin damage – DERMA Moving Versus DERMAPEN
Professor Tony Chu, FRCP, Skin care Department, Imperial College, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United kingdom
Background
Percutaneous bovine collagen induction has been utilized for many years in treating atrophic acne skin damage. It's most effective in moving scars and can possess some effect on box skin damage. Probably the most effective technique used up to now is Derma rollering. This can be a mechanical device which includes surgical steel micro-needles inside a wheel that is rolled away and lower the affected region. Needle length is usually 1.5mm and also the skin is treated four occasions in three different directions. We've used this method within our treatment centers during the last four years, dealing with on the 1000 patients. The outcomes happen to be very good up to now. The process is, however, painful leaving the individual very red-colored for 4 days following the procedure. The brand new Dermapen uses exactly the same principal but instead of utilizing a moving action, the Dermapen moves the needles out and in for a price of approximately 1000 occasions per second. This eliminates the moving injuries towards the skin that may occur with derma moving.
Method
This was a open comparative study of derma moving and Dermapen in 60 patients with atrophic acne skin damage to check simplicity of use, patient preference and efficiency. Patients were randomized to get either derma moving or Dermapen. All patients had had one previous treatment with derma moving. Had mainly moving scars and none had active acne. Methods were carried out by 3 skin doctors. Patients and skin doctors completed a questionnaire about the simplicity and discomfort experience and period of down-time. Depth of selected scars was measured while using Visioscan VC98 before and three several weeks after treatment.
Results
Patients given the Dermapen all felt the procedure was a smaller amount painful than derma moving and also the down time was considerably shorter using the Dermapen. Subjectively, patients given the Dermapen felt their acne skin damage had enhanced to some greater extent than patients with derma moving. Visioscan data demonstrated considerably greater decrease in depth of scars while using Dermapen in comparison to Derma moving.
Conclusion
Management of acne skin damage continues to be considerably advanced with the development of derma moving. The brand new Dermapen, however, has a number of benefits. The disposable needle heads tend to be more cost-effective than derma moving. Patients felt the Dermapen was a smaller amount painful coupled with shorter down time compared to derma moving. Skin doctors felt it had been simpler to make use of and enabled sites like the upper lip and nose to become given ease. The Dermapen also demonstrated considerably superior decrease in scar depth following a single treatment with typically 29% reduction using the derma curler in comparison to 42% average using the Dermapen.
Professor Tony Chu, FRCP
Department of Skin care
Imperial College
Hammersmith Hospital
DuCane Road
London W12 0HS, United kingdom
To learn more about Dermapen, please call 0870 40 30 246 or email View Dermapen for action online at
0 comments:
Post a Comment